This sounds ominous to some but most are not at additional risk. The studies this review were based upon also concluded that early treatment led to more overall time and cost than later treatment. Some would therefore choose to delay treatment but some of the more active/sporty patients or those not willing to bear the risk will seek early treatment. However what type of trauma are we talking about? This is discussed in the textbook I helped edit and author titled, Evidence-Based Clinical Orthodontics.
One of the clinical trials included in the review quantified the types of trauma seen in those receiving early or late treatment and they found that 80% of
the trauma was in the enamel only (small chips as pictured) while 19% were more involved and into dentine while only 1% had reached the nerve. If we then consider major trauma to be only the dentine and
nerve involvements (or any knocked out) this is only ~20% of all the additional trauma. This then gives 20% of 9.4% (or 0.2 x 9.4%) which is only a 1.9% higher risk of a major
trauma if delaying treatment until the age of ~13 rather than treating at age 9-10. This then allows you to make a more informed choice about the risk of trauma if choosing to delay treatment of protrusive upper teeth until all the adult teeth have erupted.Dr Peter Miles is the orthodontist at Newwave Orthodontics in Caloundra, Australia and teaches orthodontics part-time at the University of Queensland and is a visiting lecturer at Seton Hill University in the USA.
You can read some more articles and stories shared by the patients on their experiences at dental clinics. Refer the link to know more.
ReplyDelete